The Six Most Common Breakdowns in the Process for Disruptive Innovation

Change Logic has a fifteen-year track record helping companies beat the odds to build disruptive new ventures. Drawing on this experience and research from our Harvard and Stanford founders, we have isolated the six most common breakdowns in the process for disruptive innovation. These are six repeating problems that, if we prevent, will increase the odds of success.

Innovation Zoo

High participation means more ideas, which increases the chances of having a breakthrough. However, it also dilutes focus, with bad ideas sucking funding away from good. Focusing energy on defined ‘hunting zones’ where the opportunities are greatest increases yield on innovation investment.

Innovation Zoo

Inside-Out

Experts know the technical possibilities an innovation creates, but that doesn’t mean it is something customers want to buy. Innovators need to learn what problems customers want to solve. That requires a disciplined approach to discovery that isolates the ‘job to be done’.

Compass

Pilot Purgatory

Lean Startup practices have liberated firms from constraints of stagegate innovation. However, too many business experiments get stuck in limbo neither approved nor cancelled. That’s not because they are bad ideas, but because they lack enough support from the internal ecosystem to win investment.

Pilot Purgatory

Investing Ahead of Learning

It has become fashionable to ‘fail fast’, however, learning is the goal, not failure. Unfortunately, incubating new ideas can be a painstaking process. Executives get restless and impatient. This can cause them to act before the data are in. They need to learn to respect different sorts of metrics.

Invest

Crossing Wires

Core beats Explore is an axiom a corporate innovator should remember. When a business is under pressure the need to deliver short-term results, will always make it attractive to cut radical innovation. The best way to avoid this is to separate out exploratory innovation as a separate unit – in an ambidextrous organization.

Wires

Capacity to Act

Faced with a decision to commit resources to a radical innovation or to sustaining today’s business, some leaders freeze. They stand at the precipice but do not act. Acknowledging the competing commitment is step one in the process of managing it to enable core and explore to prosper.

Capacity
cta

We are growth builders

We partner with visionary leaders to realize their businesses’ full potential.