Harvard Business School

Michael L. Tushman

Michael L. Tushman

Paul R. Lawrence MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus

Paul R. Lawrence MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus

Technological change, executive leadership and organizational adaptation.

Technological change, executive leadership and organizational adaptation.

The question at the center of the work

How can an established organization explore the new while continuing to perform in the core?

How can an established organization explore the new while continuing to perform in the core?

Tushman’s research examines why successful organizations become committed to the capabilities, structures and identities that produced today’s results—and what senior teams must do when the future demands something different.

Tushman’s research examines why successful organizations become committed to the capabilities, structures and identities that produced today’s results—and what senior teams must do when the future demands something different.

The research

The research

Across several decades, the work follows a connected argument: industries and technologies change; organizations develop commitments around what has worked; senior leaders must renew the organization without abandoning the performance and capabilities of the core.

Across several decades, the work follows a connected argument: industries and technologies change; organizations develop commitments around what has worked; senior leaders must renew the organization without abandoning the performance and capabilities of the core.

Innovation streams and technological change

Innovation streams and technological change

How periods of incremental change are interrupted by discontinuities that make established capabilities less valuable.

Organizational ambidexterity

Organizational ambidexterity

How distinct structures, measures and capabilities allow exploration and exploitation to coexist within one enterprise.

Senior teams and strategic paradox

Senior teams and strategic paradox

How leadership teams hold competing demands together, make resource choices and create a shared strategic intent.

Identity, renewal and open innovation

Identity, renewal and open innovation

How organizational identity and boundaries shape whether firms recognize, adopt and scale unfamiliar ideas.

Four ideas to carry into the work

Four ideas to carry into the work

Explore and exploit require different organizational arrangements.

The core is designed for reliability and improvement. A new business is designed to learn under uncertainty.

Separation is necessary, but never sufficient.

The new business needs protection from the core and deliberate access to customers, expertise, technology and other assets.

The senior team holds the two agendas together.

Leaders must decide where to integrate, how to allocate resources and which evidence warrants further commitment.

Renewal depends on identity as well as structure.

A credible account of what the organization is—and can become—helps people support change without discarding what matters.

A guided reading path

A guided reading path

These selections provide a route into the work: begin with the managerial argument, examine the underlying research, then see the questions in context.

These selections provide a route into the work: begin with the managerial argument, examine the underlying research, then see the questions in context.

Start here

Harvard Business Review · 2004

A concise account of why breakthrough work needs a distinct organization and active integration by the senior team.

Leadership

Harvard Business Review · 2011

Read this for the leadership practices required to manage contradictions rather than force a false choice between them.

Book

Charles O’Reilly and Michael Tushman · 2021

The fullest practical account of how established companies can exploit current strengths while exploring new businesses.

Book

Andrew Binns, Charles O’Reilly and Michael Tushman · 2022

A guide to the people and systems that turn an opportunity inside an established company into a business at scale.

Research review

Academy of Management Perspectives · 2013

A deeper synthesis of the evidence, boundary conditions and unresolved questions behind the concept.

Research in practice

California Management Review · 2011

A multi-company study of what managers actually did when implementing ambidextrous designs.

HBS case

Harvard Business School case

A recent case about leading renewal in a large incumbent while preserving the capabilities needed to perform.

HBS case

Harvard Business School case

A case for examining how an established enterprise organizes, leads and connects an emerging opportunity to the core.

HBR article

Harvard Business Review · 2016

A practical account of how leaders work with persistent contradictions instead of treating them as choices that can be settled once.

Classic book

Michael Tushman and Charles O’Reilly

The foundational book connecting innovation streams, organization design, culture and leadership through periods of stability and change.

Complete books and HBR articles

The guided selections above are a place to begin. The complete verified record below brings together Michael Tushman’s books and Harvard Business Review articles.

BOOKS

2022

Andrew Binns, Charles A. O’Reilly and Michael L. Tushman

Wiley

2016 first edition · 2021 second edition

Charles A. O’Reilly and Michael L. Tushman

Stanford Business Books

2015

Rebecca Henderson, Ranjay Gulati and Michael L. Tushman, editors

Oxford University Press

1997 first edition · 2004 second edition

Michael L. Tushman and Philip Anderson, editors

Oxford University Press

1997 first edition · 2002 revised edition

Michael L. Tushman and Charles A. O’Reilly

Harvard Business School Press

1998

David A. Nadler and Michael L. Tushman

Oxford University Press

1998

Donald C. Hambrick, David A. Nadler and Michael L. Tushman

Harvard Business School Press

1989

Michael L. Tushman, Charles A. O’Reilly and David A. Nadler, editors

Ballinger

1982 first edition · 1988 second edition

Michael L. Tushman and William L. Moore, editors

Ballinger

1988

David A. Nadler and Michael L. Tushman

Scott Foresman

1980

David A. Nadler, Michael L. Tushman and D. Hatvany

Little, Brown

1974

HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW

2025 · May–June

Ivanka Visnjic, Felipe Monteiro and Michael L. Tushman

2019

Marya Besharov, Wendy K. Smith and Michael L. Tushman

2018

Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Michael L. Tushman and Karim R. Lakhani

2017 · Digital article

Michael L. Tushman, Anna Kahn, Mary Elizabeth Porray and Andy Binns

2017

Michael L. Tushman, Anna Kahn, Mary Elizabeth Porray and Andy Binns

2017

Michael L. Tushman, Anna Kahn, Mary Elizabeth Porray and Andy Binns

2016 · May

Wendy K. Smith, Marianne W. Lewis and Michael L. Tushman

2011 · June

Michael L. Tushman, Wendy K. Smith and Andrew Binns

2010 · Digital article

2008 · July–August

Adam M. Kleinbaum and Michael L. Tushman

2004 · April

Charles A. O’Reilly and Michael L. Tushman

Questions this work helps a leadership team examine

Questions this work helps a leadership team examine

Where does the new business need different measures, talent, processes or investment criteria?

Which assets of the core create an advantage, and how will access to them be governed?

Who resolves conflicts over customers, talent, funding and leadership attention?

What evidence will justify further investment, a change in direction or a decision to stop?

What shared identity allows people to support both today’s commitments and tomorrow’s possibilities?

How the research connects to Change Logic

How the research connects to Change Logic

Change Logic uses this body of work to help leadership teams make specific organizational choices. Ambidexterity clarifies where the core and a new business need different arrangements. The Congruence Model tests whether the work, people, formal organization and culture support each agenda. The management system gives leaders a place to make resource decisions, resolve tensions and hold one another accountable.

Change Logic uses this body of work to help leadership teams make specific organizational choices. Ambidexterity clarifies where the core and a new business need different arrangements. The Congruence Model tests whether the work, people, formal organization and culture support each agenda. The management system gives leaders a place to make resource decisions, resolve tensions and hold one another accountable.