OUR METHODS
ON THIS PAGE
Strategic issue
Teams bring a performance gap or opportunity they must address.
Education
Professors introduce research and tools that sharpen how leaders see the issue.
Dialogue
Teams test interpretations and surface the barriers they may be helping to sustain.
Commitment
Leaders agree the actions, ownership and conditions required to move forward.
A critical mass of leaders
The source design accommodates as many as 100 participants working in up to eight teams.
Professors and practitioners
Partner professors bring the research. Senior practitioners facilitate each work team and connect the ideas to the business.
Tailored content and cases
The readings, cases and frameworks are chosen around the strategic questions the teams must resolve.
Working sessions, not presentations
Most of the forum is spent applying the ideas, comparing interpretations and developing commitments in teams.
Common evidence
Everyone works from the same facts, sequence of events and decision point.
Productive distance
Leaders can examine sensitive choices before turning directly to their own roles and commitments.
Judgment in practice
The discussion requires a recommendation and the reasoning that supports it, not passive agreement with a framework.
How we use cases inside the forum.
Select or create
Choose a case that illuminates the strategic issue, or develop one from the organization’s own experience.
Prepare
Leaders study the evidence and decide what they would do before hearing the group’s view.
Discuss
Small groups and a facilitated plenary make assumptions, disagreements and trade offs explicit.
Apply
Teams use the insight to reconsider their own issue, choices and responsibilities.